01 · AI output
The answer looks clean.
But the team cannot prove which source, prompt, model state, retrieval path, or decision rule produced it.
Mariana Lungu · Northern Virginia · --:-- ET
I help regulated teams build data and AI systems that can be traced, defended, and trusted after the output leaves the screen.
The problem I solve
The output is polished. The workflow runs. The presentation lands. Then someone asks where it came from, what changed, who touched it, and whether it can be trusted later.
That is the room I am built for: when AI, data, governance, and judgment have to hold together.
01 · AI output
But the team cannot prove which source, prompt, model state, retrieval path, or decision rule produced it.
02 · Data systems
But the lineage is thin, the handoffs are informal, and the record breaks the moment someone asks what changed.
03 · Regulated work
After launch, after adoption, after an audit, after a client asks for proof. That is when architecture matters.
When to bring me in
The standard
Before I trust a system, I look for the record underneath it. Not a screenshot. Not a promise. A path someone else can inspect.
Operating standard
01 · Provenance
Source, retrieval path, confidence, and decision context stay attached so the work can be defended later.
Live trace · 12:51 PM ET
The answer starts with cited source material, not a generated guess.
The receipt
I built a retrieval system on federal policy documents to prove the standard instead of describing it. Every answer carries its evidence, decision context, and audit trail.
automated tests behind the retrieval pipeline
This is the kind of receipt a buyer can inspect: not just what shipped, but how it was tested, traced, and made defensible after the fact.
policy passages indexed with lineage
This is the kind of receipt a buyer can inspect: not just what shipped, but how it was tested, traced, and made defensible after the fact.
audit fields recorded for every answer
This is the kind of receipt a buyer can inspect: not just what shipped, but how it was tested, traced, and made defensible after the fact.
content hashing on every indexed record
This is the kind of receipt a buyer can inspect: not just what shipped, but how it was tested, traced, and made defensible after the fact.

The origin
Federal systems, immigration cases, benefits processing, congressional inquiries: data that touched real people and had to be right. That is where my sense of provenance came from.
I learned to build where almost right was not good enough: where handoffs mattered, records had to survive scrutiny, and the quiet work underneath the visible system decided whether people could trust it.
This site is not my résumé. It is the public signal of that standard, and why I should be the person in the room when the system has to stand up later.